Close Menu
superupdates.site

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    House with a Square Window / SET Architects

    Onn Hair Salon / Spicy Architects + swarm Inc.

    Zasadený House / Pauliny Hovorka Architekti

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    superupdates.site
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Car Insurance
    • Home Insurance
    • Pet Care Insurance
    • Home Improvement
    • Real Estate
    • Pets
    superupdates.site
    You are at:Home»blog live»Supreme Court revives FBI ‘wrong house’ raid lawsuit
    blog live

    Supreme Court revives FBI ‘wrong house’ raid lawsuit

    RbadaBy RbadaJune 12, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email



    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday revived a lawsuit against the FBI in a damages claim arising from an incident in which agents raided the wrong house in Atlanta.

    The ruling marks a narrow win for Toi Cliatt, his former girlfriend Trina Martina and her son Gabe Watson, who were all present in the house during the October 2017 encounter.

    The unanimous decision written by Justice Neil Gorsuch means they can continue to press claims alleging assault, battery and false imprisonment under a law called the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), one of the few avenues to hold federal officials accountable. Litigation will now continue in the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    “We look forward to continuing this fight with the Martins in the Eleventh Circuit and making it easier for everyday people to hold the government accountable for its mistaken and intentional violations of individual rights,” Patrick Jaicomo, a lawyer at the libertarian Institute for Justice who represents the plaintiffs, said in a statement.

    The case highlights the problem of law enforcement raiding the wrong house, which has happened in several high-profile cases.

    A district court judge and the appeals court ruled for the government.

    The legal question touched upon on whether a particular provision of the law, which allows claims concerning the actions of federal law enforcement officers, is trumped in this instance by another provision called “the discretionary function exception,” which protects certain judgment calls from liability.

    The court did not resolve that question, but did remove a barrier to the plaintiffs being able to argue it in lower courts.

    “We readily acknowledge that different lower courts have taken different views of the discretionary function exception,” Gorsuch wrote. “We acknowledge, too, that important questions surround whether and under what circumstances that exception may ever foreclose a suit like this one.”

    In a separate concurring opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that “there is a reason to think” that the discretionary function exception should not bar the plaintiffs’ claims. Her opinion was joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

    During the raid in question the agents had guns drawn and used flash-bang grenades as they entered the house.

    Cliatt was handcuffed and thrown on the floor. Martin wanted to rush to her son but wasn’t allowed to move. Watson, then 7, woke up to see agents with guns in his bedroom.

    The agents quickly left the house upon realizing their error and a supervisor returned later to apologize.

    The Justice Department in court papers said that a Garmin GPS device that FBI agent Lawrence Guerra used to lead the team to the house had indicated the agents had arrived at the correct location.

    The FBI was seeking to arrest a man named Joseph Riley, who lived nearby. After they left the wrong house, the agents raided the correct home. Riley was arrested and later convicted.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleTravelers defeats $1.4 million delay claim in builder’s risk coverage clash
    Next Article Salman Khan Shares Condolences After Ahmedabad Air India Plane Crash: ‘Deeply Saddened’
    Rbada
    • Website

    Related Posts

    TikTok Sales, Meta Fails And What Actually Works On Social Media

    June 23, 2025

    New video shows fellow SEALs disparage Edward Gallagher

    June 13, 2025

    Chelsea in contact for £43m “special talent”

    June 13, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Adidas Settles With OSHA Over Safety Violations

    June 11, 2025

    Derby gas explosion: Man injured and two houses destroyed in blast | News UK

    June 11, 2025

    SINOVAC's Board of Directors Issues a Letter to Shareholders Outlining Clear Pathway to Restore Fairness and Deliver Value to All Shareholders

    June 12, 2025

    Why Is ChatGPT Down? Inside the AI Platform’s Outage – Hollywood Life

    June 11, 2025
    About Us

    Welcome to Super Updates, your trusted source for reliable information on car insurance, home insurance, and pet care insurance. We provide expert tips, comparisons, and guides to help you make smarter financial and home-related decisions. Whether you're looking to protect your assets or improve your living space, we've got you covered. Stay informed and empowered with our easy-to-understand updates and insights.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Study suggests H3.1 biomarker may help assess sepsis in ICU patients

    Insider Doesn’t See Steelers Trading T.J. Watt This Year ‘Under Any Circumstances’

    Flights suspended after plane crash in Kazakhstan

    Most Popular

    House with a Square Window / SET Architects

    June 30, 2025

    Top-Rated Lawyer for Insurance Claims Auto: Win Your Case with Expert Legal Help

    May 22, 2025

    Get the Best Home Insurance Quotes in Rhode Island: Ultimate 2025 Guide

    May 22, 2025
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.